Games in Progress: 3 | Players logged in: 3 | Players Registered: 37413 | Games Played Total: 68656
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The value of a plot of land.  (Read 280 times)
Makelith
Jr. Planeteer
**
Posts: 22


View Profile
« on: August 01, 2010, 18:05 »

I've been away from the game lately, but I believe a plot of land still counts as 500 towards your total score.  Whatever it is currently I feel that it is far too low, the value of a plot of land should be at least 1000.  I don't believe in valuing each plot individually (though it would make sense) but the base score effect should be a bigger impact than just 500.  The number of plots you own has a HUGE effect to how well you can do.  Keep in mind the value should have nothing to do with how much you paid for it. 
Logged
kipley
Prototype Tester
Mule Regular
***
Posts: 68


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2010, 18:34 »

The number of plots you own has a HUGE effect to how well you can do.

Agree with this completely!  However, I draw a different conclusion than the one you arrived at.

Land is already very important to winning, as each plot of land can produce goods for you throughout the game, contributing mightily to your final score.  Also, each plot of land you have is one plot of land less that your opponents can have, so owning more land is also a good defensive boost even if you're not currently producing anything on it.

A plot of land also gives a 500 boost to your total score just for owning it.  You want to increase that value.  But increasing it just makes land, which is already ridiculously valuable, even MORE valuable!  As it stands right now, very often the person who wins the game is the one who owns the most land at the end.  If you made land worth 1000 or 2000 or whatever, it just slants things even more in that direction.  Raise the value of land too high, and it would be practically impossible to win the game by any other method other than winding up with the most land.  The game would be less interesting if the amount of land factored even more highly into who wins than it already does.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: