Rigged chatlogs

[jagov808]

'Anyone who believe that a person like Donald Trump, a man who has been sued over 3500 times for not paying his contractors, who's lawyers would only meet with in groups of two because he lies so much, who stays up late at night to go on twitter rants, is going to lead them to the promised land has a bunch of bright orange wool pulled over their eyes.'

Classic motorman!

Wish you all the best in the burgeoning jug market. I think it is paramount you get out to market asap, especially if you want to cash in on the Christmas season. You really don't want a lot of piss jug inventory hanging around in the first half of 2017. Word on the street is that the Chinese are developing a whole new material to coat piss jugs which would make pre-2017 piss jugs pretty much obsolete. At the same time you don't want to lose momentum and wait another year before release. I would do a mini launch to build excitement now and use the scarcity to help market your second generation jugs.

[motorman]

So the truth is classic me? Nice. The funny thing is you think a Trump victory validates your opinions as if he wasn't just using your hate for his own personal gain.

How's that Hillary Clinton prosecution looking? Oh right.

Keep boycotting cereal and voting with your feelings instead of learning the facts you overly-sensitive little girls. I mean that Bush presidency went so swimmingly that... oh wait... oh yeah... your goldfish brain. Well aren't you in for a surprise.

[jagov808]

The Bush family has now moved to the Dems. Didn't you see the endorsements man? This is probably one of the biggest reasons people support Trump, because you are right, Bush did an awful job.

Trump will end up worse off financially as a result of holding office. Not sure what personal gain you are talking about. Trump has to appear magnanimous for legal, social and political reasons. The incoming AG however will be free to act differently.

I've publically spoken out against the cereal boycott, that's the kind of thing people like you do. Of course the whole episode is just Kellogs trying to save face. Not many people in the reality based community are slopping up that gmo carb-laden garbage. If you want to keep Gerald happy you ought to cut it out of your diet too.

It appears as though a lot of your views are direct parroting of the lowest common denominator oriented media outlets. You have the capacity for much more. Why waste your clearly superior brain?

[motorman]

My point about Bush is for some reason you think you don't have to hire a politician to do the top politician's job. Where as if someone told you their were tired of pilots flying airplanes and they wanted to make a "change" and have plumbers do it you would think they were nuts.

Trump has already become an international embarrassment with his "chats" with the leaders of Pakistan and Taiwan. He is completely tone deaf to international politics and has chosen to ignore the state department's advice.

All the foreign diplomats staying in Trump's hotels suggest he is profiting quite nicely off of his presidency. The fact that he refuses to put his businesses in a blind trust a serious cause for concern. Trump has yet to appear  "magnanimous." He's still childish and petty on Twitter and to think any 70 year old man is going to change his ways is just foolish. If anything he appears boorish and smug.

Now let's talk about his cabinet of billionaires. How exactly is stacking his cabinet with a bunch of rich white guy Washington insiders "draining the swamp." This is just like Hillary Clinton, which you refuse to address. He told you something,  you believed it, and now he's going to do what the Republicans always do and make the rich richer.

The Bush's did not become democrats. They realized the sheer idiocy and danger of electing someone like Trump to the presidency and did the only thing they could, like many sensible republicans. But hey, you showed em. And now World War III might start because your blowhard president can't read a state department report.

My views are taken from actual news organisations that require journalistic standard of fact checking and quality control unlike Breitbart which has been proven time and time again to post "fake" news. And when the head of Breitbart is also Trump's chief strategist how can you not see a massive conflict of interest that violates the idea of journalistic integrity? Oh I know, because they tell you what you want to hear and that's good enough.

[jagov808]

Talking to Taiwan is a tactical move.

Billionaires that have made their money outside of government. Why are the Pelosis and Clintons worth hundreds of millions given their resume?

The Bushes are sensible Republicans?

The state department is probably the most Islamophobic institution around. They have the blood of half a million Syrians on their hands.