Planet M.U.L.E.
Planet Mule 1 => Planet M.U.L.E. 1 Discussion => Topic started by: Howie on February 09, 2010, 02:51
Title: Plural for Wampus? Post by: Howie on February 09, 2010, 02:51 Wampuses or Wampi????
Title: Re: Plural for Wampus? Post by: trouba on February 09, 2010, 06:36 Wampi. Do not ask me why, it's just a feeling ;)
Title: Re: Plural for Wampus? Post by: poobslag on February 09, 2010, 23:26 what about... wampodes :P
Title: Re: Plural for Wampus? Post by: Soldier Ant on February 11, 2010, 14:56 Melanie?
Title: Re: Plural for Wampus? Post by: Dragonmaw on February 13, 2010, 03:23 It would be either wumpi or wampodes.
Title: Re: Plural for Wampus? Post by: Mega Byte on February 14, 2010, 17:25 I've always to wampus in the plural as wampus-- just like deer. :)
(For one, I've never seen more than 1 at a time... ;)) -S Title: Re: Plural for Wampus? Post by: keybounce2 on February 15, 2010, 00:20 Before you can talk about the plural of Wampus, you need to establish the existence of two or more. Everything discovered so far is that Wampus only are seen singularly; the implication is that there is only one of it in existence -- and it is both immortal and teleportational. Kinda like the Winslow.
Now, if there is only a single Wampus, then the plural is meaningless. It's like asking what the pluras of God is. Everyone knows that "Dios" is already plural. :-) One fish, two fish. One God, Two God. One Wampus, ... Title: Re: Plural for Wampus? Post by: Mega Byte on February 15, 2010, 00:23 Well, like Elvis, there was only "one". But eventually there were a number of them in one place, and so the plural Elvi was accepted.
I really feel, like the deer and moose, wampus is also the sigular and the plural. :o Title: Re: Plural for Wampus? Post by: Soldier Ant on February 15, 2010, 13:46 I am for Wampuses.
Title: Re: Plural for Wampus? Post by: Mega Byte on February 15, 2010, 14:14 I could support that too. :D
|